Many people believe that it is our duty to cut back on our use of the world’s resources, and that we must invest in greener forms of energy for the future – whatever the cost.
Write an article for an environmental website which argues for or against this idea.
(24 marks)
The idea that people have a duty to cut back on the use of resources and that we must invest in greener forms of energy for the future whatever the cost is in my opinion true and needs to be done to preserve human life in the way of reducing global warming and and ultimately reducing the strain on the planet so that we can preserve our species for a longer period of time. But i believe that the edition of “whatever the cost” makes me question Wether i should agree with the statement because by saying “whatever the cost” it could link to many things which are bad for other people so i personally agree with the statement partially but i think that it should not result in violence or harm to any one.
Many people could disagree with this statement maybe because they think that the environment is fine and the recourse intake is not an issue for the world. this would be wrong though because it has been scientifacly proved that the ozone level is thinning which has resulted in some areas becoming more warm or cold also the sea levels rising due to this.
ps sorry so short sir all i could do in 30 minutes
React!